FDIC pins Signature Bank’s failure on poor governance and illiquidity

Share This Post

The United States Federal Deposit Insurance Corp’s (FDIC) post-mortem assessment of Signature Bank of New York (SBNY) revealed poor management and inadequate risk management practices as the root cause for its collapse.Signature Bank was shut down by federal regulators on March 12 in a bid to protect the U.S. economy and strengthen public confidence in the banking system. FDIC was appointed to handle the insurance process. @federalreserve @USTreasury @FDICgov issue statement on actions to protect the U.S. economy by strengthening public confidence in our banking system, ensuring depositors’ savings remain safe: https://t.co/YISeTdFPrO— Federal Reserve (@federalreserve) March 12, 2023

On April 29, FDIC’s report on the matter highlighted the collapse of major US banks — Silvergate Bank and Silicon Valley Bank — caused illiquidity due to deposit runs. The regulator further stated:“However, the root cause of SBNY’s failure was poor management. SBNY management did not prioritize good corporate governance practices, did not always heed FDIC examiner concerns, and was not always responsive or timely in addressing FDIC supervisory recommendations (SRs).”FDIC blamed SBNY’s board of directors and management for pursuing “unrestrained growth” using uninsured deposits without implementing liquidity risk management strategies. The final nail in the coffin for Signature Bank was when it could not manage liquidity, which was required to fulfill large withdrawal requests. Correlation of SBNY’s stock price to crypto-industry events. Source: FDICThe report also revealed that Signature Bank often denied addressing FDIC’s concerns or implementing the regulator’s supervisory recommendations. Since 2017, FDIC sent numerous supervisory letters to SBNY citing regulatory, audit or risk management criticisms, as shown below.Proposed SRs from targeted review Supervisory Letters in process at the time of SBNY’s failure. Source: FDICDue to non-compliance with the recommendations, the FDIC had downgraded SBNY’s Liquidity component rating to “3” starting in 2019, further highlighting the need to improve its funds management practices.Related: ‘Ludicrous’ to think Signature Bank’s collapse was connected to crypto, says NYDFS headTwo government bodies were reportedly investigating Signature Bank for money laundering prior to its collapse. A report from March 15 highlighted that Justice Department was investigating the bank for potential money laundering. In addition, a parallel probe by the Securities and Exchange Commission was reportedly underway. However, it remains unclear how the investigations aided the bank’s closure.Magazine: Whatever happened to EOS? Community shoots for unlikely comeback

Source
FDIC pins Signature Bank’s failure on poor governance and illiquidity is written by Cointelegraph By Arijit Sarkar for cointelegraph.com

Related Posts

SEI: A Comprehensive Guide to a Unique DeFi Blockchain

SEI is an emerging player in the decentralized finance...

Bitcoin bounces at 1-month lows — Watch these BTC price levels next

Bitcoin has fallen to one-month lows and traders are...

On the Margin Newsletter: Inside Trump’s ‘monumental’ meeting with BTC miners

Today, enjoy the On the Margin newsletter on Blockworks.co....

Trezor Launches New Hardware Wallet ‘Safe 5’ with Bitcoin-only Variant

A Trio of New Trezor ProductsMatěj Žák, CEO of...

AAVE: An In-Depth Look at a Leading Decentralized Finance Protocol

Aave (AAVE) is a prominent decentralized finance (DeFi) protocol...

Wat Project Expands to Two Million Wallets on Telegram

Initially, Gamee, a hypercasual gaming ecosystem under Animoca Brands,...
ethereum
Ethereum (ETH) $ 3,554.38
bitcoin
Bitcoin (BTC) $ 66,467.81
tether
Tether (USDT) $ 0.99978
xrp
XRP (XRP) $ 0.495954
binance-usd
BUSD (BUSD) $ 0.991342
cardano
Cardano (ADA) $ 0.414379
dogecoin
Dogecoin (DOGE) $ 0.135673
litecoin
Litecoin (LTC) $ 79.30
solana
Solana (SOL) $ 145.03